[whats faster] - ATV Riders Forums - Honda, Yamaha, Suzuki, Kawasaki, Polaris, CanAm, Arctic Cat, Kymco ATVsPages:1
whats faster
(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)
Posted by: 250exxxx
be honest whats faster a mojave or a blaster i think its a blaster but just tell me what you think NOTE i dont have a 250ex i have a race blaster but i just esed the name because it sounded cool plus im thinking of getting a mojave not a lokata or should i tell me what you think
Posted by: m.h.s.c.#527
it says in your sig you have a 250 ex my guess is ur on someone elses account
Posted by: 250exxxx
yea my friend maaxes
Posted by: 250exxxx
i wouldent be cought dead on a 250ex to slow for me but their a fun quad and really great in the trails
Posted by: mojavemark
Just my 2 cents worth here. It depends where you ride them and how modded ya have them. Stock for stock the Blaster is better out on the sand than a Mojo, on a MX track I think there about even, it just depends on the rider, in the woods I dont know that the Mojo is "faster" but I know it is easyier to be fast on the Mojo.
Its just kinda hard to make a honest direct comparison between a 2stroke and 4stroke.
I know this answer is kinda a cop out, but this is just what I seemed to have noticed since I got my Mojave.
Posted by: Ruby Soho
the blaster is faster when you run them down a strip.
but riding them like an everyday guy in trails and such a mojave would be faster, more torque, power and better handling.
Posted by: kawiefan
In the trails the mojave owns the blaster. More useable power. More protection against mud. Top speed wise they are about the same. I personally think that the mojave has better suspension.
They're both good machines but I like the mojave better for trails.
Posted by: weld_13
They're really about the same, remember 5% quad and 95% rider. They're both really mx purpose quads and it depends on mods. The mojave will do awsome in xc racing or mx as long as it's setup corectly but the blaster is really easier and cheaper to find parts for. I've owned both a mojave and a blaster and wouldn't trade my mojave for a blaster since I started racing xc, the 4-stroke low end advantage is just better. It really depends on rider and conditions.
Posted by: 07350R
If you put a 13 tooth front sprocket on a Mojave it will beat a blaster, easily, the power comes on strong in mid and topend, I raced my 03 with only jetting and a supertrap pipe against a stock warrior on a 600 foot dirt drag strip last saturday and beat him by one full bike length. We raced 3 times and the same every time.
Posted by: Mikeman1
Acceleration (0-40)-I would have to say the 2-stroke.Top speed-the Mojave.
Posted by: I live for this
I have both and the top end speed the blaster might be a little faster but, the blaster will get to it faster too. six speed trans are nice that way. It is impossible to make a honest comparison between a 2 and 4 stroke they both have advantages and disadvantages, the mojo handles better and like most 4 strokes it's easier to be fast on. Get a crw 330 or 370 kit and the mojave kicks ***
Posted by: tim colston
quote:
Originally posted by 250exxxx
be honest whats faster a mojave or a blaster i think its a blaster but just tell me what you think NOTE i dont have a 250ex i have a race blaster but i just esed the name because it sounded cool plus im thinking of getting a mojave not a lokata or should i tell me what you think
Blaster
you need to get yourself some spelling lessons.
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2003, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final - Created by Xenon and modified/released by Adam J. de Jaray