[Question] - ATV Riders Forums - Honda, Yamaha, Suzuki, Kawasaki, Polaris, CanAm, Arctic Cat, Kymco ATVs

Pages:1

Question
(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Posted by: jingle42

Hey guys i was wonderin what bike would be better to put alot of money into to race a blaster or a 300ex?

Posted by: blaster99

alright, ive ridden both, and a 300ex is better to put a bunch of money into and race. the good points of a 300 are awsome tourqe, and low end power, better suspension componets avalable for better handling, more room to lean in corners. wit ha blaster, youve got more top end speed, and there alittle cheaper. there lgihter, but not by much, i coudlent notice a diffrence.

Posted by: nitronate

Why is it that on the blaster forum people that own blasters and race them say that they think a 300ex is a better machine? If you think it is a better bike, then why don't you have a 300ex instead? I don't have either bike yet, but I want a Blaster and I am curious to know.

Posted by: blasterfreak99

because some of us blaster owners are not biased and know and admit when a quad is better than ours. if i could start over again i would get a 300ex and put all the money and time that i put into my blaster into a 300ex.