[250r rear end setups comparison/ ?'s] - ATV Riders Forums - Honda, Yamaha, Suzuki, Kawasaki, Polaris, CanAm, Arctic Cat, Kymco ATVs

Pages:1

250r rear end setups comparison/ ?'s
(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Posted by: brandonpeake

how does the no link setup like the roll design setup compare cr500 linkage setup laeger uses or can be used with laeger swingers?
is one setup a mx and one an xc? I am curious about the handlung and difference between the two

Posted by: racerx573

You can use both for either kind of racing, it was done in the pro class and all other ranks all throughout the old days. No link would probly be better for XC, due to ground clearance. The CR link does kind of hang a little lower than most. CR500 tends to be a bit more people for MX, due to its leverage ratios. Although I have heard of no-links having better forward traction to to the lack of delay in power delivery from the suspension movement. Both take hard hits from big jumps excellent, and both are awesome in the whoops compared to a stock set up.

Posted by: qmurder24

i have a like new roll design
(gull wing style) no link arm that is killer i also have a axis shock to match 2 dune trips on shock. and arm was fully serviced by roll new bearings chain roller updates and powdercoat. even have the heavy duty stainless steel skidplate. im thinking about parting the bike?

Posted by: doc-bones

How much for gull swinger?

Posted by: qmurder24

for sale w/ shock only since it was specifically set up for that arm.

Posted by: opdmize

How much for everything?