[Maybe a little weak?] - ATV Riders Forums - Honda, Yamaha, Suzuki, Kawasaki, Polaris, CanAm, Arctic Cat, Kymco ATVsPages:1
Maybe a little weak?
(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)
Posted by: CHEVYZ
This topic is mostly out to the Raptor 700 guys. Have any of you had or heard of problems with the durability of these things? I have heard some serious horror stories, and I have witnessed a few wrecks that were surprisingly not too pretty. For example, a guy down at a local place that I ride at flipped his bike... he was in good shape, but his bike was a mess. At that time another guy told me that his buddy who has one flipped in about second gear on his and ended up ripping damn near the whole front end off. My buddy with one is a little worried about the decision that he has made.... hell I sent my 450r flipping on the throttle in 4th and it barely left a scratch on my plastic. Anyone here to comment? Not here to dis anything, just want info. 
Posted by: MadDog56
Heard of some weak subframes, but overall not bad. The front bumper looks like it's designed to have a crumple zone.
Posted by: 700YELLOWRAPTOR
No 2 crashs are the same some times you get lucky.I have had yamaha wheelers for the past 20 years tri-moto 175,200e,225dx,225dr,big wheel 200,350 woverine,700 se raptor.Had i few crashs along the way bent bars,brokin brake levers thats it.Thats not to say i did not break the 200e in half but it was not meant to be jumped 8-10 feet in the air a few 1000 times,got it welded rode a few more years and sold it.I have 80 hour on the raptor no probs so far"no crashs"1 oh **** but i landed it,durability just like all i have owned A+++++.
Posted by: MadDog56
Yamaha's steering stems are notorious for bending like butter, and there are common frame problems with other bikes like the 04 yfz. Believe it or not every problem is not by chance, some parts on some bikes are just weaker than others and therefore will have a greater tendency to fail.
Posted by: Metora
yeah raptors suck my balls my yamhama blaster 1989 is better
Posted by: Blue_Streak23
quote:
Originally posted by Metora
yeah raptors suck my balls my yamhama blaster 1989 is better
That was a little random.
Anyways, it is spelled "Yamaha".
Posted by: CHEVYZ
Metora = http://offtopic.forumup.org/images/smiles/hate-alcool.gif?
Posted by: CHEVYZ
so far"no crashs"1 oh **** but i landed it ( Posted by 700YELLOWRAPTOR)... that's funny as hell!
Thanks to everyone who replied. Looks like there are a few problems, but obviously nothing like was described.
Posted by: MaxxRPM
Well, with big horsepower comes big crashes........ The faster you go the more damage, right?
Posted by: CHEVYZ
I was refering to crashes in like first or second gear, where not much speed can be attained. I know the Rappy is a large bike.... all of that heft is a reason to break. 
Posted by: 700YELLOWRAPTOR
heft 422 full of fuel really not that much weight-dry weight like 397 not much more than your 400ex or 450r
Posted by: CHEVYZ
Why 450 weighs around 350 dry. You would be surprised how much more 50 pounds is on something like that. Not saying that it is necessarily something bad, just commenting that speed is not really the factor of the question. Hell, if it were all about speed my 450r would be destroyed by now. 
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2003, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final - Created by Xenon and modified/released by Adam J. de Jaray