[Blaster or 300 EX?] - ATV Riders Forums - Honda, Yamaha, Suzuki, Kawasaki, Polaris, CanAm, Arctic Cat, Kymco ATVs

Pages:1

Blaster or 300 EX?
(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)

Posted by:

I am 120lbs. 6ft. tall. Am i too big for a blastrer? should i get the 300ex?

Posted by: exman250

nice sig.????

The Blaster is alittle to small for me.Iam5'6 and they semm a lil too small.Get the 300ex.

Posted by:

yea i figured that sig out at the best high school party ever

Posted by: Cannibal440

300EX

Posted by: sportraxrider10

300EX

Posted by: own2424

go wit the 300ex. I ride my friends blaster, and my knees feel like they hit the handlebars, im 5'8". 300ex will just feel more comfortobale than the Blaster to a 6' person like you. Good Luck

Posted by: loganB

I say go for the 300ex my cousen is 5feet9 and 220poundes and every time he getes on his blaster you can almost hear it cry.

Posted by:

300Ex

Posted by: Nausty

300ex I just sold our blaster and it was WAYYY to small for me and when I rode it i wasn't over 6ft and I was banging my knees and botteming like crazy. My friend that I ride with rides a 250x which is equivalent to a 300ex because it runs higher compression but the 300ex runs a bigger bore but they arn't much differant and I like the 300 much more and I feel Like i can do a lot more with them than a awkward blaster with no torque.

Posted by: PDunes300ex

Blasters are fun little quads. You can actually squeeze a lot of power out of those tiny 2-strokes. They are all over the dunes here. Speed wise...a modded blaster can be quicker than a 300ex. But beware...I was racing around with one a couple weeks ago and kinda pi$$ed i couldn't smoke the kid on the sand track...then i realised why I bought my 300ex as soon as the kid flipped over the front in the whoops section because the blaster is soooo darn short. Go 300 or 400 because the blaster has no suspension and you will definately be cramped.

Posted by:

**** the 300 ex man. The blaster is way better. i have a 300 ex and a blaster along with a 2002 banshee. And the 2002 blaster is better than my 2000 300 ex. It kills it. Get the 2003 blaster, those are sweet. Either that or **** em both, GET THE BANSHEE. KILL EM ALL!
D-ROK:devil

Posted by: Rastus

ummm,yeah....

sure you do....

Blasters stock shocks suck.Thats a plain fact. And, there're too short for some things.

id get a 300EX, more reliable, has good suspension,and with some mods it will do great.

Posted by:

quote:
Originally posted by '92 : 250X er
Blasters stock shocks suck.Thats a plain fact. And, there're too short for some things.

actually, no they dont, i hit a jump at a friends house that could have easily launched me over the hood of a truck (1500, f150) and i landed in the flats, my shocks came nowhere near bottoming out. blaster shocks may not have that much travel, but they don't bottom out a lot

Posted by:

dude get a 300 or maybe even a 400!

Posted by:

i am fine with the bike i got

Posted by: Poncho

300ex

Posted by: honda250xrider

i would say a 300 the blaster is just to small u would have to widen everything before you could get comfortable on it and still they feel pretty small

Posted by: phatswinn

thers like 10 300ex's and like 2 blaster votes, i had the blaster for a week then i sold it because it would tipp in every corner i took and its like 3 ft long, get the friggen 300ex and get it over with